I prioritise story over science, but not at the expense of being really stupid about it.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Science coverage could be improved by the recognition that science is timeless, and therefore science stories should not need to be pegged to an item in the news.
I was interested in science before I even knew what science was.
Science is the greatest of all adventure stories, one that's been unfolding for thousands of years as we have sought to understand ourselves and our surroundings.
All writers are going to have to learn more about science, because it's such an interesting part of their environment.
I think it's unfortunate when people say that there is just one true story of science. For one thing, there are many different sciences, and historians will tell different stories corresponding to different things.
I read science, because to me, that's extremely exciting. It's like a great detective story, and it's happening right in front of us.
We can make science personal, like a love story or your best friend.
I have friends who are science journalists, and I'm seeing stories of theirs or talking with them about ideas that they're pitching. Certain kinds of science are around me all the time, like climate change and biology.
I've always been a science fiction fan since I had understood the conception of what a story was.
I love it when real science finds a home in a fictional setting, where you take some real core idea of science and weave it through a fictional narrative in order to bring it to life, the way stories can. That's my favorite thing.
No opposing quotes found.