Yes, I believe that the art of winning is through intimidation, and not necessarily do you have to speak about it.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
No matter what the situation, winning takes care of a lot of stuff. Things are never perfect, even when you win. But it does make for a lot better environment, for sure.
President Obama seems to think that you win by demonstrating that you're a more reasonable person than your opponents. It didn't work too badly, I'll grant, as an electoral strategy in the 2012 election.
Intimidation doesn't last very long.
I've said many times, 'You learn to win through not liking to lose.' And that's what I mean by learning how to win.
Any time you have a competitive situation like politics is, there are winners, and there are people who don't win, and their supporters can sometimes be very emotional.
Don't believe that winning is really everything. It's more important to stand for something. If you don't stand for something, what do you win?
You have to be very careful when you let someone win.
I disagree with people who think you learn more from getting beat up than you do from winning.
I don't think ethical people deal with intimidation as a method to achieve success. Undermining someone's self-esteem isn't a method to achieve success.
I believe there's an inner power that makes winners or losers. And the winners are the ones who really listen to the truth of their hearts.