From search and books to online TV and operating systems, antitrust affects our daily digital lives in more ways than we think.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Changing technologies, changing marketplaces, and even changing trends in anti-competitive practices have all presented challenges to antitrust enforcement.
Regardless of the industry, antitrust law is meant to benefit consumers - not competitors.
Most Americans don't think about antitrust law when they look at their cable bill, flip channels on TV, or worry about what their favorite website knows about them. But they should.
Vigilant and effective antitrust enforcement today is preferable to the heavy hand of government regulation of the Internet tomorrow.
Antitrust law isn't about protecting competing businesses from each other, it's about protecting competition itself on behalf of the public.
The history of antitrust law enforcement shows that successful antitrust prosecutions have often strengthened and brought vitality to extremely large companies and businesses.
Being able to compete for consumers' attention and dollars over the preciousness of access is a thing of the past. Everyone is using the Internet to globally market a product.
The Internet has made us richer, freer, connected and informed in ways its founders could not have dreamt of. It has also become a vector of attack, espionage, crime and harm.
Evidence and economic theory suggests that control of the Internet by the phone and cable companies would lead to blocking of competing technologies.
Antitrust is the way that the government promotes markets when there are market failures. It has nothing to do with the idea of free information.