Throughout history there have been many other examples, similar to that of Haeckel, Huxley and the cell, where a key piece of a particular scientific puzzle was beyond the understanding of the age.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There are also scientific problems with the concept that each of the creation days was a long period of time.
The position of modern science, as far as an ignorant man of letters can understand it, seems not a step in advance of that held by Huxley and Romanes in the last century.
Many have gone on to do important scientific work but all remember those wonderful times when we and our science were young and our excitement in meeting new challenges knew no bounds.
I realized that lab research was the perfect path for me. It allowed me to spend every day figuring out mysteries/puzzles that have to do with what make us alive. What could be a bigger mystery or puzzle?
That which today calls itself science gives us more and more information, and indigestible glut of information, and less and less understanding.
Tracing the beginnings of the interwoven stories of science can be arbitrary, as beginnings are so often lost in the mists of time.
In the earlier years when I started this project at Stanford University, everyone told me it was nuts to go and try to reproduce the mysterious complexities that occur in a whole cell.
Heisenberg, Max Plank and Einstein, they all agreed that science could not solve the mystery of the universe.
Amazingly when you add life and consciousness to the equation you can actually explain some of the biggest puzzles of science.
Biology has at least 50 more interesting years.
No opposing quotes found.