In artillery exercises, women always win because they're more accurate.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
On the contrary, woman is the best equipped fighting machine that ever went to battle.
Combat duty is strenuous and physically demanding, and I'm not the first person to notice that men and women are built differently. And while many will argue that women will only be allowed into combat arms units under the same requirements as their male counterparts, count me as skeptical.
Whether we like it or not, gender differences matter in a combat situation.
I think women are too valuable to be in combat.
It is pure mythology that women cannot perform as well as men in science, engineering and mathematics. In my experience, the opposite is true: Women are often more adept and patient at untangling complex problems, multitasking, seeing the possibilities in new solutions and winning team support for collaborative action.
They are more than men at the outset of their battles; at the end they are less than the women.
Much of the demand for women in combat comes from female officers who are eager for medals and promotions.
Women are tough campaigners. They certainly know how to withstand attacks. And I think we make a mistake if we say, as some do, that women should play by different rules, or that they are somehow especially vulnerable to the rules of politics. I don't think that's true.
There are certain things women are better at than men.
I do not believe in using women in combat, because females are too fierce.