When a movie becomes very successful, it's automatic that people will start thinking a sequel, a prequel, a quel-quel.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There are expectations with sequels, and people want them to be bigger and better than the prequel.
When I am making a sequel, it needs to be different from what you have already seen. Yet, it needs to maintain a certain discipline so that people still associate it with the prequel.
The first is that instead of writing a sequel, which is what most people do, this is in fact a prequel. Although we didn't know that when we began the process.
I think a sequel is a waste of money and time. I think movies should illuminate new stories.
The truth is when you have a movie that was as successful as 'Chronicle' was, it's not as quick of a process. There are a lot more voices coming in and saying 'This is what the sequel should be' because there's a bigger expectation and a bigger fear of failure. And that's really what's going on with 'Chronicle 2.'
I mean, frankly, I'm not speaking as a representative of Disney or Pixar, I'm speaking as just myself as a filmmaker: I don't go into anything that often thinking about a sequel.
While I always thought of making sequels to movies like 'Ghayal,' the filmmakers would almost always veto the idea.
With a sequel you're always trying to get bigger and better.
A lot of people ask for sequels, but what they really want is just to know the characters are happy and safe.
By definition a sequel can't be original. So you've got to figure out what worked the first time around.
No opposing quotes found.