I think there's kind of a simplistic, kind of knee-jerk response that all you have to do is build a 2,000-mile wall, and problem solved.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I know there's a lot of discussion about building a 2000-mile wall. I think we need to complete the Secure Fencing Act, but we need greater technology and aviation aspects down on the Southwest border so we can see the threat from the sky. Until you can see it, you don't know where it's coming from and how to correctly stop it.
It's more complex than just slapping up a wall. We have got to take a look at all the complexities in terms of eliminating the incentives for illegal immigration.
It's just so unfortunate that, as we get adjusted to this global economy, that the U.S. is even thinking about building walls.
Building walls isn't going to work in the long run. Some people are happy with the wall in Israel, but somebody will get a weapon someday and knock it over or something. Walls aren't the answer between countries, though.
We build too many walls and not enough bridges.
You can focus on things that are barriers or you can focus on scaling the wall or redefining the problem.
Instead of building walls, we should be building bridges.
You can't build another bridge that's so close to ours. It's stupid.
If I were president of the United States, I'd build a great wall along the Mexican border and not let anybody in.
You don't build walls; you build bridges between people.