Dr. Evil got shortchanged in the first one. The family dynamic between Scott and Dr. Evil - the adventures of being an evil single parent - needed to be explored.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The first idea the child must acquire is that of the difference between good and evil.
Evil changes everybody!
What is their potential for evil; what is their potential for wickedness? That's the only time that those characters become interesting to watch.
I think evil is very relative.
Evil is relative - and what I mean by that is that our villains are as complex, as deep and as compelling as any of our heroes. Every antagonist in the DC Universe has a unique darkness, desire and drive. And the reason for being of 'Forever Evil' is to explore that darkness.
Evil is always devising more corrosive misery through man's restless need to exact revenge out of his hate.
People are fascinated by evil because it's mysterious and it doesn't seem to have a rationale behind it, and the second you say that Hannibal Lector was abducted as a child and he had to eat his sister or something like that, it becomes immediately mundane. The character becomes mundane.
While early childhood experiences may impel, they do not compel. In the end, evil is a matter of choice.
Evil is easy, and has infinite forms.
The man who does evil to another does evil to himself, and the evil counsel is most evil for him who counsels it.
No opposing quotes found.