Wikipedia has a way of compiling compendiums of information on subjects.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I like to read about subjects unrelated to my work, especially history.
Wikipedia is just an incredible thing. It is fact-encirclingly huge, and it is idiosyncratic, careful, messy, funny, shocking and full of simmering controversies - and it is free, and it is fast.
I think it's important never to look yourself up on Wikipedia. I think the temptation to correct any interesting factual errors would be too much.
Wikipedia is kind of extreme, where a very, very small group of people contribute pretty much everything.
Wikipedia is kind of weird. I feel it's lame to put up my own page, but I desperately want someone else to do it.
We need librarians who can handle this tremendous jumble of information that is in cyberspace.
The core of Wikipedia is something people really believe in. That is too valuable for the world to screw it up.
Wikipedia was a big help for science, especially science communication, and it shows no sign of diminishing in importance.
Wikipedia is so dangerous.
Encyclopedias are finished. All encyclopedias combined, including the redoubtable Britannica, have already been surpassed by the exercise in groupthink known as Wikipedia.