No state on earth can afford to allow several authorities to co-exist next to one another.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There are lots of nations in the world or national peoples who don't yet have states. They're inside someone else's state and they want a state of their own.
States can be deterred by the fear of retaliation; non-state organisations cannot by deterred at all.
It is unfortunately none too well understood that, just as the State has no money of its own, so it has no power of its own.
No state should be allowed to profess partnership with the global coalition against terror, while continuing to aid, abet and sponsor terrorism.
We cannot build foundations of a state without rule of law.
If you have a federal government that's not enforcing the law and does not preserve the integrity of its own borders, then naturally, states are going to take matters into their own hands.
States are not moral agents, people are, and can impose moral standards on powerful institutions.
No state is free from militarism, which is inherent in the very concept of the sovereign state. There are merely differences of degree in the militarism of states.
A state is better governed which has few laws, and those laws strictly observed.
The diversification of the people's demand could not be followed by the state apparatus.
No opposing quotes found.