What I object to the current government intervention in so-called 'solving the crisis', they haven't solved anything. They've just postponed it.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I am certain that we need a solution completely separate from military intervention.
The realization is dawning that government doesn't work. In Silicon Valley, they already get this. And they are bright enough to be asking what we can do to solve problems.
Our problem is not adopting reforms, which we will do without question. It is not reaching an objective, which we will meet. But it is finding an end to the recession.
You need a real crisis before you have reforms.
Faced with a deep recession, some say the answer is to expand the role of government.
One of the things government should be around for is to deal with catastrophes. It should do that well. To me, that's a government function, and we shouldn't be playing political games with it.
And I think if the president's made a mistake here, it's this laid-back kind of approach where he's waiting for someone else to solve the problem. Some people say it's a political strategy. No matter what it is, it's not effective in solving problems.
I am a really impatient person who wants to see many issues fixed with solutions that don't yet exist.
There are cases where government-to-government aid actually has worked. Look at the eradication of smallpox and the near eradication of polio. But these are really top down solutions that require government-to-government support and aid.
Governments tend not to solve problems, only to rearrange them.
No opposing quotes found.