My wealth is reflected in the price of Severstal, and the number of shares I have in my possession doesn't have any impact on the company.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
When buying shares, ask yourself, would you buy the whole company?
If you count all your assets you always show a profit.
No one owns you. One hundred per cent of the stock in your personal corporation belongs to you.
The overwhelming majority of my rated wealth consists of investments in companies that produce goods and services.
My wealth came from growing businesses. I had wealth, but not liquidity. Basically I transferred illiquid shares of AIC for liquid shares of Manulife. Now I'm the biggest individual shareholder of Manulife.
Most shareholders have little if any control over the companies in which they own stock, even if they own a million shares.
I couldn't have predicted the business would be worth so much. I could see that we would have this sort of market share, but I didn't realise the numbers would be so large.
I am the largest market shareholder of clothing in the U.K. and I am not a destination shop for food. If the clothing market is affected - and it has been - and I hold my market share mathematically, then fine, I am doing no worse than the market is doing, which is exactly the case, but I'm losing revenue.
You will always need more capital than you think, because it will always take you longer to reach profitability than you can imagine.
Be true to yourself, and, um, don't worry about some large companies' quarterly profit index.
No opposing quotes found.