When I started out, it was considered very wrong to change an image. There were scandals if someone inserted a sky into a war picture or something. Now it's all about that.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There is no need to change my image. I like my image, and the audience likes it, too. I am very comfortable with the kind of roles I do, and as I am not doing the same character or playing myself. I explore my characters; I don't brood over my broody image.
I want to change the bad boy image that has stuck for a bit because I don't think I am at all how I have been portrayed. I would like that to change because it's awful to hear and read what is said of you.
What intrigues me is making images that confound and confuse the viewer but that the viewer knows, or suspects, really happened.
It's kinda all about image.
I think it's somebody else's job to decide what my image is.
I'm trying to trick people into thinking about the unthinkable by using pop culture images.
Making a pretty picture, an image, is a completely different thing from acting to camera.
I kept wanting to push my image as validity; I wanted to see my portrait on a wall and know it was okay.
Most campaigns rely on photographs because the moment you do something that is a graphic interpretation where any artistic license has been taken, I think a lot of people are scared that it's going to be perceived as propaganda.
I felt the most effective way to change people's perception was through the power of images.