It was easy to present figures demonstrating the contrast between lead work in the United States under conditions of neglect and ignorance, and comparable work in England and Germany, under intelligent control.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think anybody can relate to the reluctance to have to lead sometimes.
Generally, it is human endeavour to have young people lead, and you see that in public life in the U.S. and everywhere.
People learn to lead because they care about something.
You know, I've always tried to look at things as just what the part was. I never tried to worry about whether it was the lead or not the lead, because I think you can really mess your mind up when you're too caught up in those things.
Of all the means I know to lead men, the most effectual is a concealed mystery.
You cannot lead others until you have first learned to lead yourself.
Nothing so conclusively proves a man's ability to lead others as what he does from day to day to lead himself.
There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.
Well, a lead is the most important thing about the story.
There can be no intelligent control of the lead danger in industry unless it is based on the principle of keeping the air clear from dust and fumes.