Science operates in the natural, not the supernatural. In fact, I go so far as to state that there is no such thing as the supernatural or the paranormal.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
As a scientist, of course, we have to believe there is no supernatural. There are only natural entities in the universe. And those are the things that we study as natural scientists.
The supernatural is the natural not yet understood.
I think the supernatural is a catch-all for everything we don't understand about the vast other parts of life that we cannot perceive.
When I am writing, I do not distinguish between the natural and supernatural. Everything seems real. That is my world, you could say.
Mysteries once thought to be supernatural or paranormal happenings - such as astronomical or meteorological events - are incorporated into science once their causes are understood.
Whatever the scientists may say, if we take the supernatural out of life, we leave only the unnatural.
I've always been intrigued by the supernatural.
It is often said that science must avoid any conclusions which smack of the supernatural.
Where 'Paranormal Activity' really comes into its own is its rhetoric of legitimacy - how it uses itself to authenticate itself, and thus furthers the pretence of being real.
When I'm writing books, something weird happens; and the result is the books contain a large amount of what you could call 'supernaturalism.' As a writer, I find I need that to explain the world I'm writing about.
No opposing quotes found.