If people want to change the law, they should vote so that we can appoint pro-life judges. I believe the law should be changed.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
People's lives have to change as a result of this legislation.
Judges should interpret the laws according to what they say, not according to what the judges wish they would say. Judges are supposed to interpret the laws; they are not supposed to make them.
The president appoints the judges. Your lives and your children's lives can change by all of these appellate court judges who will be appointed who will reinterpret laws, and things can change.
Let there be no reservation or doubt that I believe the Senate should vote on each and every judicial appointment made by the President of the United States and that no rule or procedure should ever stop the Senate from exercising its constitutional responsibility.
States should have the right to enact laws... particularly to end the inhumane practice of ending a life that otherwise could live.
This pro-choice issue is a legal issue that should be decided by the courts.
A new constitution should be more amendable. A needlessly confusing system of courts should be altered to produce an arrangement that would be simple, responsible, and less awkward.
Judges should interpret the law, not make it.
The only people that should vote should be legal.
Judges should be in the business of declaring what the law is using the traditional tools of interpretation, rather than pronouncing the law as they might wish it to be in light of their own political views.