One often thinks that using 2 different things like visual and sound lead to 2 different conclusions - to a different content - but in in my case it is all one.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Some things can be perfectly expressed by sound alone and images would only be disturbing. Other times, sound would be possible, but visuals are much stronger and closer to what I want to express and then again, they sometimes overlap perfectly.
Everything for me is visual. That's just how my head works.
Also, differences of opinion can be creatively stimulating as well as frustrating.
I think that the things that are interesting sometimes, when you're striving for a sound, you just get it wrong 'cause of your own limitations. That's when you get something kind of original.
Music is powered by ideas. If you don't have clarity of ideas, you're just communicating sheer sound.
I've always felt that a person's intelligence is directly reflected by the number of conflicting points of view he can entertain simultaneously on the same topic.
It's a visual world and people respond to visuals.
What is the good of drawing conclusions from experience? I don't deny we sometimes draw the right conclusions, but don't we just as often draw the wrong ones?
You can't rely on your own perception when it comes to anything. You can always be proved wrong.
Part of the scientific temperament is this tolerance for holding multiple hypotheses in mind at the same time.
No opposing quotes found.