What ultimately happened is that my country had a war. I think it would be extraordinary, as a writer, not to want to write about that.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I wish I was the kind of writer who would go to a war zone and write about something that's meaningful and important to people, but that's not my area of coverage.
I always wrote - not about war, necessarily, but I always wrote stories. I tried to write while I was in Iraq. It's not really - I didn't do a very good job, and not about war.
I wanted to write about my mother as she should have been if she had not been messed up by World War I.
I think I would have been a writer, anyhow, in the sense of having written a story every now and then, or continued writing poetry. But it was the war experience and the two novels I wrote about Vietnam that really got me started as a professional writer.
I think I would have done very well as a writer in the Forties. I think the last time America was a great country was then or not long after. It was before Vietnam, before Watergate.
If you're going to write about war, which my books are about, wars are nasty things. I think it's sort of a cheap, easy way out to write a war story in which no one ultimately dies.
War continues to divide people, to change them forever, and I write about it both because I want people to understand the absolute futility of war, the 'pity of war' as Wilfred Owen called it.
I'm a writer. I don't support any war. That's my principle.
I said in my heart that, rather than have war, I would give up my country.
Writing tends to be very deliberate. A novelist could probably run a military campaign with some success. They could certainly run a country.
No opposing quotes found.