When you have a lot of construction going on, it sends a message of vitality that builds up consumer confidence. It gets people to spend money when they see that energy, that things are happening.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Building is just skilled labor, I suppose. It's a lot of work. I don't mind other people building them, but the way things go together and are made is interesting to me; I like that a lot.
Because, if we understand how a building is to be produced and we find a way that it can be more simply produced, then obviously we are contributing to building better buildings more easily.
Not only does investing in your infrastructure provide very good construction jobs, at the end of the project, you have something.
Price creates incentive, and energy will be developed if there's demand for it at the price you can develop it.
When it becomes economically possible, building will become montage.
People need to see where their dollars are going and what infrastructure is being built.
People worry that gas prices are high and how they are affecting their pocket book. But they want to know about renewable energy. People are really starting to question things, and that's made people look to the future in a positive way.
What makes the production of my work so expensive? The whole installation thing - the construction, the objects, the technology. It really adds up.
When a house is being built which is to be made as strong as possible, the building takes place in fine weather and in calm, so that nothing may hinder the structure from acquiring the needed solidity.
The main thing that's missing in energy is an incentive to create things that are zero-CO2-emitting and that have the right scale and reliability characteristics.
No opposing quotes found.