A painter, a sculptor, a writer, they can express freely. They don't affect society as a whole. We build buildings that have a purpose, that stay there for hundreds of years or decades.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
A work of art has no importance whatever to society. It is only important to the individual.
It's easier to make art for a society at a certain point in time with an understanding of what's going on.
Let us together create the new building of the future, which will be everything in one form: architecture and sculpture and painting.
The role of art in society differs for every artist.
Art reflects society. Cinema doesn't dictate - you portray what the society demands.
Architecture is my work, and I've spent my whole life at a drawing board, but life is more important than architecture. What matters is to improve human beings.
Architecture is a visual art, and the buildings speak for themselves.
I think all art is, by nature, intended to motivate society for change, and the only reason change doesn't happen is because within the target population, courage is lacking.
It's not new that architecture can profoundly affect a place, sometimes transform it. Architecture and any art can transform a person, even save someone.
With a painter or a sculptor, one cannot begin to alter his works, but an architect has to put up with anything, because he makes utility objects - the building is there to be used, and times change.