An there is always the question: is it really proven that retaliatory actions solve the security problem?.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The question is, really, does the nonexistence of another attack prove that the programs that are in place are working?
Only in growth, reform, and change, paradoxically enough, is true security to be found.
If you accept that security is a process, and if you can eliminate the human interaction or intervention in that process by automating more, that is a good thing.
We are living in a world where everything is based on security.
Doesn't the fight for survival also justify swindle and theft? In self defence, anything goes.
There's almost no problem that can't be solved. That's important as a premise. History has proven it over and over again.
Security is when everything is settled, when nothing can happen to you; security is the denial of life.
The terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, changed the way we think about security.
All military regimes use security as the reason why they should remain in power. It's nothing original.
It is manifest that the only security against the tyranny of the government lies in forcible resistance to the execution of the injustice; because the injustice will certainly be executed, unless it be forcibly resisted.
No opposing quotes found.