No matter how much it's growing, the Internet still is a pretty specific demographic. It doesn't necessarily represent the general populace.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think there's a gigantic generation gap in terms of how people understand the Internet and how much they think technology is an important factor in social change.
When I was born, the Internet was barely two years old. It was the preserve of academics, used to connect dozens rather than billions of users. There weren't many who predicted it would transform our world.
The Internet is just a bunch of servers and broadband cables and routers that traffic data around the world. But I think now the Internet is starting to become an entity that society views as a human thing.
As a society, we haven't spent as much time building the citizen Internet.
The Internet, the network of networks, is growing at an exponential pace. It's growing so fast, in fact, nobody really knows how many people use the Internet.
There is an underlying, fundamental reliance on the Internet, which continues to grow in the number of users, country penetration and both fixed and wireless broadband access.
There is a widening gap between the middle-aged-to-older generation, who still read newspapers and watch CCTV news, and the Internet generation.
The Internet is by the people, for the people.
I don't think anybody would argue now that the Internet isn't becoming a major factor in our lives. However, it's very new to us. Newsreaders still feel it is worth a special and rather worrying mention if, for instance, a crime was planned by people 'over the Internet.'
I think it's a bit silly to brand the Internet as the 'downfall of youth.'
No opposing quotes found.