The art world is a very prissy little thing over in the corner, while the major cultural forces are being determined by techno science.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
What the art world has done, it has been constantly been pushing the boundaries about what art can be. It's like expanding its territory.
Unfortunately, I haven't thought sufficiently about art. What I never realized - and it's really stupid - is the art world is the art world because all these thousands of famous and not-famous artists do things, over centuries. This hadn't occurred to me.
What strikes me is the fact that in our society, art has become something which is only related to objects, and not to individuals, or to life.
I think there are a lot more important things than art in the world. But not to me.
It makes me happy to think that this world of art-as-investment is a minuscule fraction of the art world overall. Most people who create, trade and own art do it for a much simpler reason. They just like it.
What is the intersection between technology, art and science? Curiosity and wonder, because it drives us to explore, because we're surrounded by things we can't see.
I think it is in collaboration that the nature of art is revealed.
It's easier to make art for a society at a certain point in time with an understanding of what's going on.
We are concerned with the relationship between art and life. Contemporary art is only intelligible in terms of its relationship to our life.
We don't know what the next generation of art is going to look like. We're kind of making it up as we go along. Not unlike the tech industry.
No opposing quotes found.