Wikipedia flourished partly because it was a shrine to altruism.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The core of Wikipedia is something people really believe in. That is too valuable for the world to screw it up.
Wikipedia is kind of extreme, where a very, very small group of people contribute pretty much everything.
I have always viewed the mission of Wikipedia to be much bigger than just creating a killer website. We're doing that of course, and having a lot of fun doing it, but a big part of what motivates us is our larger mission to affect the world in a positive way.
I don't think Silicon Valley understands the power of Wikipedia, how it works, or the opportunities it represents.
When Wikipedia first started, the only people interacting on the Internet were hard core geeks. Now everyone is there, and they're attracted to the easy, free ways to interact.
Wikipedia is just an incredible thing. It is fact-encirclingly huge, and it is idiosyncratic, careful, messy, funny, shocking and full of simmering controversies - and it is free, and it is fast.
Wikipedia was a big help for science, especially science communication, and it shows no sign of diminishing in importance.
It's things like Wikipedia that help us to advance as a society and help us to accelerate our evolution. If you're a researcher and you need some answer to something, and in today's world you can find it this quickly, it allows you to develop whatever you are doing much faster.
I think it's weird that the news cedes so much ground to Wikipedia. That isn't true in other informational sectors.
When my generation grew up, our only sources of knowledge were books, teachers, parents and friends. The encyclopedia was an item of luxury. We faced big limits in what we could learn, where we could be and who we could reach.
No opposing quotes found.