Personally, as a print journalist, I always found the most interesting stories to be the ones hacks talked about in the bar after work.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think any journalist who spends time in a place realizes that there are lots of stories around beyond their primary story. You meet so many interesting people and have all kinds of experiences.
Anybody who's spent thirteen or fourteen years in print journalism has a lot of stories he thinks were inwardly satisfying as far as preparation, understanding, and diligence.
The first story I ever sold was to 'Argosy' magazine, which no longer exists. That issue also contained work by several other more celebrated writers, like Ray Bradbury - so I felt I had at least one toe on the ladder.
I try to tell a story the way someone would tell you a story in a bar, with the same kind of timing and pacing.
I knew I was going to be a journalist when I was eight years old and I saw the printing presses rolling at the Sydney newspaper where my dad worked as a proofreader.
I've discovered writers by reading books left in airplane seats and weird hotels.
I admit that I am hopelessly hooked on the printed newspaper. I love turning the pages and the serendipity of stumbling across a piece of irresistible information or a photograph that I wasn't necessarily intending to read.
At one point, I had a story accepted at the 'New Yorker,' which sent off weird bells in people when I told them - 'Oh,' they thought, 'now you are a writer' - where I really had been for the last 30-odd years.
I always saw the best reporters as ones you hardly ever saw other than when they were back in the newsroom, writing their stories.
It always seemed much better to be a writer - a Real Writer - than a successful hack.