I wouldn't say that I'm a jack-of-all-trades, master of none, but I wouldn't say that I'm brilliant at any.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
My purist comedy friends accuse me of being a Jack of all trades and master of none.
I wouldn't describe myself as a master of anything.
I don't presume to think I'm great at anything.
To this day I do not believe I'm great at anything.
I'd rather be a Jack-of-all-trades than master of one. If I became an icon, where my whole life was music, I would probably have become a vegetable. I wouldn't be able to have all these talents I have today and be an interesting 'character.'
I take pride in being a jack of all trades.
Being brilliant is no great feat if you respect nothing.
I'm no good at anything but comedy, which I think I'm good at. I'm absolutely no good at networking; I'm terrible at acting; I'm terrible at dealing with executives; I'm terrible at collaborating. And I say whatever I want to say. But I think I'm good enough at comedy that I can survive. And I don't really have an ambition for money.
I think actors become jacks-of-all-trades and masters of none.
I think if you have ability and talent in one way, you have it in all ways. I'm not a jack of all trades; I'm a master of many. I don't feel there is anything I can't do if I want to.