If anything, the power of the cover of 'Time' has increased as the media landscape has atomized.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I like to say that a 'Times' editorial presents a strong opinion based on reality.
The speed of change today is faster than the human psyche seems able to handle, and it's increasingly difficult to reconcile the rhythms of our personal lives with the rapidity of a twenty-four-hour news cycle.
Times have changed; so must the lenses through which we see the political future.
The Photograph is concerned with the power that the past has to interfere with the present: the time bomb in the cupboard.
The way we experience history and time in all its forms shifted quite massively between 1989 and 2001 - to the point where contrivances like decades are now kind of silly.
American time has stretched around the world. It has become the dominant tempo of modern history, especially of the history of Europe.
We are time's subjects, and time bids be gone.
Time is what allows stories to spread into people's consciousness.
When a popular phenomenon reaches the cover of 'Time', it is already out of fashion.
The Times has much less power than you think. I believe we attribute power to the media generally that it simply doesn't have. It's very convenient to blame the media, the same way we blame television for everything that's going wrong in society.