Bipartisanship is nice, but it cannot be a substitute for action, not having it cannot prevent us from going forward.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Bipartisanship helps to avoid extremes and imbalances. It causes compromises and accommodations. So let's cooperate.
Bipartisanship is really tough to achieve when everyone on both sides is left with a bad, bad taste in their mouths.
We don't need bipartisanship, we need application of principle.
I understand that one of the purposes of bipartisanship is to cram something difficult and necessary down the American people's gullets for which neither party has the fortitude to assume full responsibility. It's a way of turning a possible gangplank into a teeter-totter.
I have a mindset that says bipartisanship ought to consist of Democrats coming to the Republican point of view.
I'm a believer in bipartisanship.
I'm a strong believer in bipartisanship.
If ever there was a time for true bipartisanship, it is today.
There's a huge cost in being bipartisan, a tradition started by Newt Gingrich when he took over the House in 1994 and has continued forward, that you dare not vote against the Republican Party even if you're voting against your own initiatives and your own interests.
Bipartisanship isn't an option anymore; it is a requirement. The American people have divided responsibility for leadership right down the middle.