I have newspapers coming to me and saying, 'Can we get in on the TARP?'.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
For many impoverished people, living under a tarp or in a cardboard box is a way of life.
Tardiness in literature can make me nervous.
TARP is funded by taxpayers, so there are many rules about how that money can and can't be used. The result: GM spends an awful lot of time checking in with the people who administer TARP over everything from hiring to executive compensation and management. For a global company, that adds up to a lot of distraction.
Tardiness often robs us opportunity, and the dispatch of our forces.
If you were approaching the TARP investments from a pure investment standpoint, then there's no doubt in my mind the taxpayer lost, and probably lost big.
The destructiveness of the tar sands is not inevitable. But Canadians and Albertans have become too tolerant of the politicians who compromise the nation's energy security as well as the next generation's future.
TARP became so politicized that having money from it was almost like a scarlet letter. There were debates over compensation, worry that the rules were going to get changed. All the banks were desperately rushing to get that money back as soon as possible - in part, so they could pay themselves bonuses without any government restrictions.
I think newspapers will survive in some form or another.
Extracting oil from the tar sands is a nasty, polluting, energy-intensive business.
We want to take good tidings home to our people, that they may sleep in peace.