I view my role now as providing more of a macro-level skepticism, rather than saying this poll is good or this poll is evil.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I encourage active skepticism - when people are being skeptical because they're trying to identify the best course of action. They're trying to identify the next step for themselves or other people.
I'm hoping I can evade a type and go for roles based on what I consider plausible and what I consider good.
I take a role because it makes sense to me, rationally.
My role is not so much to lobby but be a sounding board for people. That's a more effective place for me to be.
I am not going to answer any questions as to my association, my philosophical or religious beliefs or my political beliefs, or how I voted in any election, or any of these private affairs.
Skepticism is not a position that you stake out ahead of time and stick to no matter what.
Quite often, I have a compelling sense of how a role should be played. And I'm proved - equally as often - quite wrong.
When a poll is really, really out of whack with what I want to happen, I do have a tendency to disregard it.
I am the skeptic of skeptics.
I have always chosen roles that I believed in - not ones that I thought might further my career.
No opposing quotes found.