A dialogue among civilizations can be seen as a dialogue between the individual and the universal.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I hope to use dialogue and culture as a means of bringing people of various cultures together, and using that as a way to resolve conflict.
A writer is justly called 'universal' when he is understood within the limits of his civilization, though that be bounded by a country or an age.
Dialogue means debates and everyone's point of view.
In order to be universal, you have to be rooted in your own culture.
I see people in terms of dialogue and I believe that people are their talk.
Speech is civilization itself.
I think the only universal thing is one individual. If you talk about a country or a nation or a culture, it's so vague. I mean what is a nation? A nation is full of nice and bad and long and tall and short and thin people. It's not like everybody is the same.
All objects, all phases of culture are alive. They have voices. They speak of their history and interrelatedness. And they are all talking at once!
Monuments and archaeological pieces serve as testimonies of man's greatness and establish a dialogue between civilizations showing the extent to which human beings are linked.
Civilizations can only be understood by those who are civilized.
No opposing quotes found.