If we perform the romantic repertoire we need more musicians.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think that musicians should never forget about the intimacy of bringing two people together, and the aesthetic transference where you're almost vicariously involved in a romance between other people.
If our history can challenge the next wave of musicians to keep moving and changing, to keep spiritually hungry and horny, that's what it's all about.
You think, 'Musicals, they must always be romantic' - You'd be surprised how few of them historically have ever been romantic.
If we have any hope for survival of the music that we all love, compassion must replace name-calling, fairness must replace greed, and we need to come together as a musical community and try to understand each other's problems.
We need improvement in the style of performance. There is no more advantage in a musician who plays and conducts than in one who is only a beater of rhythm.
Musicians are always eclectic. Musicians are always curious and hungry for new things.
History's most treasured musicians were believed in and cultivated to reach their potential. Today, it would be difficult for those musicians to get deals. We have the insight and the tools to identify and bring to fruition the dormant talent that our artists possess.
People will always need love, romance, a tender touch, and really personal and deeply felt music.
We all feel love, and that might sound kind of corny, but I really feel that's what joins musicians together around the world.
Our idea is simply to play the songs and to emphasize our musicianship.