The U.S. cannot be the policeman of the world. When we tried that in Vietnam, they beat us up.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
America is a world leader, but we should not be its policeman or ATM.
Why does America always need to be the world's policeman?
The United States' job is not to police the whole world.
U.S. society doesn't want to play the role of international policeman.
The U.S. should worry about the effects of its polices on the rest of the world. We would like to live in a world where countries take into account the effect of their policies on other countries and do what is right, broadly, rather than what is just right given the circumstances of that country.
Where the stakes are the highest, in the war on terror, we cannot possibly succeed without extraordinary international cooperation. Effective international police actions require the highest degree of intelligence sharing, planning and collaborative enforcement.
It's not easy being the world's policeman. No one thanks you for it.
We have a lot of bad leaders around the world that operate in ways we would never tolerate in the United States.
We are not a country that subscribes to policing any part of the world. The areas we are comfortable with are capacity building, intelligence sharing, exchange of ships, call on each other's ports, joint training and exercises.
The United States isn't a dictatorship ruling with a brutal army and an iron fist, so our police departments must understand that they are there to serve and protect us - all of us. And when they do commit crimes, they must be arrested and prosecuted like anyone else, bottom line.
No opposing quotes found.