We all might ask ourselves why we tune in to these more trivial matters and tune out when it comes to Darfur.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We need to begin an all-out diplomatic offensive on Darfur in order to prepare the way for a peacekeeping force that can ensure protection for the people of Darfur.
While Americans have heard of Darfur and think we should be doing more there, they aren't actually angry at the president about inaction.
The conflict in Darfur could escalate to where we're seeing 100,000 victims per month.
Individuals can stand up against genocide in Darfur and Iran's quest for nuclear weapons.
In all, dozens upon dozens of groups and organizations have prioritized stopping the killing in Darfur before there is no one left to be killed. It is high time that we, the U.S. Congress, join our name to that list.
Violence in Darfur is cataclysmic.
The news media's silence, particularly television news, is reprehensible. If we knew as much about Darfur as we do about Michael Jackson, we might be able to stop these things from continuing.
If NATO goes in and solves the crisis in Darfur, when the next one comes along Africa's leaders will just sit back.
We receive reports now on a daily basis from our own people on the ground in Darfur on widespread atrocities and grave violations of human rights against the civilian population.
It really is quite remarkable that Darfur has become a household name. I am gratified that's the case.