The smartphone killed the traditional camera industry because it subsumed all the functions of a traditional camera.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
For me, the brand of the camera is not the most important thing. I think you can take good pictures with the camera on your phone.
Today, the smartphone in your pocket has a high-quality digital camera. Everyone - not just artists - is a photographer, and the explosion of photos taken annually proves it.
I love my iPhone; it's great to have a camera around all the time.
Smartphones are so fabulous in so many ways that it seems daft to be nostalgic about the days when an image did not go round the world in a nanosecond.
Nowadays, everyone has a camera phone, and you have to be careful about being caught out there looking crazy and ending up on the Internet.
I'm technologically an imbecile. But I do use the camera phone!
Where past generations had film cameras, scrapbooks, notebooks, and that part of the brain which stores memories, we now have a smartphone app for every conceivable recording need.
There's a natural set of constraints with mobile phones that force you to be a better photographer by acknowledging and observing the world around you.
Did you know that Kodak actually invented the digital camera that ultimately put it out of business? Kodak had the patents and a head start, but ignored all that.
You can't name the inventor of the camera. The 19th-century invention was chemical: the fixative.