I couldn't tell if any frames were removed. Seen as a whole it shows that I have seen. Seeing you have 18 frames a second you can take out one or two and I couldn't tell.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It is no longer important for me to be seen in every frame.
What counts isn't the frame, it's what you put in it.
I have no opinion on 48 frames a second at all. I'd be completely unsuitable to talk about that.
I didn't want people to sit there and watch 10 minutes of film,and all they write about is 48 frames.
Cinema is a matter of what's in the frame and what's out.
48 frames per second is something you have to get used to. I've got absolute belief and faith in 48 frames... it's something that could have ramifications for the entire industry. 'The Hobbit' really is the test of that.
Forty-eight frames per second is a way, way better way to look at 3D. It's so much more comfortable on the eyes.
It is the framework which changes with each new technology and not just the picture within the frame.
A picture story just doesn't run like a film. It doesn't have 24 frames per second. It doesn't deal with this illusion of movement.
Jean-Luc Godard said that cinema is the truth 24 frames a second. I think cinema is lies 24 frames a second.
No opposing quotes found.