In terms of the arguments, I think the pro-Leave campaign is winning them all.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.
The pro-Hillary groups needed to quit fighting each other and get down to business fighting Republicans.
Arguing, in the sense of attempting to convince others, has gone out of fashion with conservatives.
The Remain campaign... I've never seen a more miserable offering. All they are saying is stay in and we'll do our best to make sure that Britain's Parliamentary independence isn't eroded faster than we can possibly imagine.
What campaigns are for is weeding out the people who, for one way or another, weren't making it for the long haul.
We are running out of time. We need a strategy to win in Iraq or an exit strategy to leave.
If you can't define a winning exit strategy for the American people, where we somehow come out ahead, then we're wasting our money, and we're wasting our strategic resources.
Some campaigns are not worth waging if you can't win; others have to be fought on grounds of principle regardless of the chances for success.
First of all, no candidate is going to win by catering to the alleged Occupy Wall Street vote.
The long term versus the short term argument is one used by losers.