I don't want to become a rhetorical speaker. My effectiveness is mastering all of the data and being able to respond.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I got my degree in rhetoric.
The duty of rhetoric is to deal with such matters as we deliberate upon without arts or systems to guide us, in the hearing of persons who cannot take in at a glance a complicated argument or follow a long chain of reasoning.
Rhetoric and dialectics can't change what I have learned from observation and experience.
I'm not really a Democrat or a Republican, but I don't like rhetoric.
I am a plain man, and I care and know comparatively little about rhetoric.
I think that what I do, in terms of how I craft my words rhetorically, is fairly simple stuff. I don't mean that to denigrate myself. I mean that in the sense of, when I write, the person that I keep in mind is my mother-in-law.
I'm a mediator by training and inclination.
Rhetoric may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion. This is not a function of any other art.
Like ministers of information, consultants condense the message, smooth out the dissonances, unify the rhetoric, and then repeat and amplify it ad nauseam through the client's rank and file.
I try very hard to maintain the confidence of my sources by speaking candidly with them, honoring agreements about the use of our conversation, and practicing journalism in an honest and straightforward way.
No opposing quotes found.