Let me be clear. 'The Good Father' isn't a handbook on how to assassinate the president.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There are many thousands of books on particular assassinations and on the subject in general, but nearly all of them deal with the victims, not the perpetrators.
Typically, you get a year in prison for making a threat to assassinate the president.
Under well-settled legal principles, lethal force against a valid military objective, in an armed conflict, is consistent with the law of war and does not, by definition, constitute an 'assassination.'
Speaking as a father, there is no rulebook, and you don't know how to do it. You just do the best you can.
To he who avenges a father, nothing is impossible.
Like father, like son, four years and this president is done.
Sometimes, his methods and his motives are questionable and even his morals are questionable in the way he does things. But I think his intention is always to protect his daughter.
Just to assassinate Michael Brown's character is wrong.
Having written for film and television, I had little interest in turning 'The Good Father' into a Hollywood thriller. I was writing a novel, and novels demand that the writer goes deeper, both emotionally and thematically.
No man is responsible for his father. That was entirely his mother's affair.