Under Clinton, the defiance of world order has become so extreme as to be of concern even to hawkish policy analysts.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It is my view that we cannot conduct foreign policy at the extremes.
Clinton saw himself much more as the steward of alliances and of consensus that moved in the right direction. He didn't see himself as someone who could change the overall thrust, I think, of global policy.
Secretary Clinton has dramatically changed the face of U.S. foreign policy globally for the good. But I wish she had been unleashed more by the White House.
What remains constant for me, during the last 15 years, has been the conviction that the cold war was a calamity for the entire world, and that it can be justified by no consideration of theory, nor by any supposed national interest.
There is a serious, immediate and extraordinarily grave threat to the continued existence of this country.
The Obama foreign policy, in broad strokes, has been a disaster.
The threat from terrorists - from extreme ideologies - needs to be challenged head-on.
Clinton himself acted in ways which increased the threat of terror.
I'm a lot less concerned with Bill Clinton's escapades decades ago than I am with Hillary Clinton's consistently wrong record when it comes to foreign policy, when it comes to domestic policy.
I think there is a failure in foreign policy. And you have to acknowledge that under Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton was the architect of that foreign policy. Whether it was malevolent or not, I don't know.
No opposing quotes found.