The Iraq War was the first conflict in western history in which an imperialist war was massively protested against before it had even been launched.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The west has a great deal to answer for in the Middle East, from Britain's belated empire-building after the First World War to the US and British policy that condemns modern Iraq to the material and social squalor of a half-century ago.
Wars such as those which have occurred in Iraq only allow hatred, violence and terror to proliferate.
We were in opposition to the decision to go to war. But after the war happened, it was clear that you could not sit and look-there would be a breeding ground for terrorism or a new collapsed or failed state named Iraq!
History will eventually depict as legitimate the efforts of the Iraqi resistance to destabilise and defeat the American occupation forces and their imposed Iraqi collaborationist government.
History teaches that war begins when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.
I also argued before the war that the administration was underestimating Arab nationalism and Iraqi nationalism, that it was not going to be as easy to rule Iraq as they thought.
But it then very soon became clear that the response of a war against terrorism, initially conceived of in a metaphorical sense, began to be taken increasingly seriously and came to entail waging a real war.
In July of 2004, I came out strongly against the war with Iraq because it was going to destabilize the Middle East.
It's the first war we've ever fought on the television screen and the first war that our country ever fought where the media had full reign.
Culturally, the First World War is the war that stands in for other wars.