In some respects, South African apartheid was more vicious than Israeli practices, and in some respects the opposite is true.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Apartheid is inherently a practice of violence.
I've never doubted that apartheid - because it was of itself fundamentally, intrinsically evil - was going to bite the dust eventually.
Abhorrence of apartheid is a moral attitude, not a policy.
No one can compare us to the apartheid regime. It's not like in South Africa between the blacks and the whites who belong to the same nation, or in Berlin where you find parents living on the eastern side and their children in the western side.
Apartheid was in South Africa; now it has been transferred to Palestine.
Apartheid either is or is not. And it must not be.
Israel is guilty of apartheid and persecution of the Palestinian people, both inside Israel and also in the Occupied Territories.
In my many trips to South Africa, I have met and spoken to a lot of people there, and they all seem to find apartheid as repellent as you would.
There was a taboo as a result of the Holocaust that people respected that anti-Semitism was an ugly thing and should be avoided. Now that taboo seems to have been broken with impunity.
It may be that apartheid brings such stupendous economic advantages to countries that they would sooner have apartheid than permit its destruction.
No opposing quotes found.