The argument that resistance to the war should remain strictly nonviolent seems to me overwhelming.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Resistance is feasible even for those who are not heroes by nature, and it is an obligation, I believe, for those who fear the consequences and detest the reality of the attempt to impose American hegemony.
Nonviolence is the only credible response to the violence we're seeing around the world.
I really believe in non-violence, but I also believe in a short of resistance that has to be respectful.
I myself am a very nonviolent person and only resort to violence when I absolutely have to.
Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.
I have never advocated war except as a means of peace.
When you do something in a nonviolent way, people will die and there will be casualties. But you're taking a different point of view that has a power.
One is called to live nonviolently, even if the change one works for seems impossible.
All war aims for impunity.
Nothing can justify war.