What Enron was doing, what caused investors to embrace it in a rapture of baffled awe, was hiding debt.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Before Enron, I think people were a bit more naive about the way things worked, and I think Enron pulled the curtain back on unsavoury practices that turned out to be a lot more widespread.
Enron had already collapsed and filed for bankruptcy protection by the beginning of 2002. But despite complaints from short sellers that corporations had used accounting gimmickry to inflate their profits, many investors thought the crisis at Enron was an isolated case.
During the Enron debacle, it was workers who took the pounding, not bankers. Not only did Enron employees lose their jobs, many lost their retirement savings. That's because they were at the bottom of the investing food chain.
Buying only what you know can end in disaster. Just think about Enron's employees and business partners, the 'locals' who bought lots of its stock because they thought they were in the know.
The collapse of Enron was devastating to tens of thousands of people and shook the public's confidence in corporate America.
Most unfortunately, Enron's plunge into bankruptcy court also cost many of its rank-and-file employees their savings.
I think that the failures of Enron and WorldCom and other companies are partially failures of investors to recognize companies that are selling for a thousand times nothing, but chances are they may be worth only that.
As the founder and former chief executive of two publicly traded companies, I have had a great deal of exposure to how debt markets work.
The moral angle to the foreclosure crisis - and, of course, in capitalism we're not supposed to be concerned with the moral stuff, but let's mention it anyway - shows a culture that is slowly giving in to a futuristic nightmare ideology of computerized greed and unchecked financial violence.
Bush began helping Enron in the eighties.
No opposing quotes found.