Were the Rolling Stones good looking? Well, Jagger was, but the rest of the dudes? Maybe not so much.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I looked at Mick Jagger and Keith Richards and the boys up there thinking, I want to be that.
The Rolling Stones seemed very loose and wild, but when you read about them, you realize that everything they did is very deliberate.
I look at Jagger and the like and if I see a good attitude I'll admire it but I wouldn't copy their style.
But, you know, the Stones were my opening act in the Sixties. I loved those British guys, the way they just stood there and shook their hair.
The Stones were more dangerous than other bands of the Sixties. It looked like they had more fun than the Beatles - like they stayed up later.
Whether it's a blatant homage or unconscious mimicry, the Rolling Stones have permanently, indelibly influenced how rock stars look and behave.
I know Mick Jagger wouldn't tour without Keith Richards and call it the Rolling Stones.
I was looking at people like Jim Morrison and David Bowie and Mick Jagger and I thought, Ah! I want to look like them.
The Stones are great and always have been. Jagger's lyrics are just amazing. Right on the ball every time.
The Stones were nasty and ugly and doing songs I was familiar with.