I don't think there's anything in the compromise that means that there's a clash of ethics.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Ethics are a key issue, and they're a key issue on the Democratic side, and all people have to be held to high standards.
Compromise on ethical conduct is not an option.
A compromise is but an act of Congress. It may be overruled at any time. It gives us no security. But the Constitution is stable. It is a rock.
The 'morality of compromise' sounds contradictory. Compromise is usually a sign of weakness, or an admission of defeat. Strong men don't compromise, it is said, and principles should never be compromised.
Politics is compromise.
Compromise, contrary to popular opinion, does not mean selling out one's principles. Compromise means working out differences to forge a solution which fits the diversity of the body politic.
All compromise is based on give and take, but there can be no give and take on fundamentals. Any compromise on mere fundamentals is a surrender. For it is all give and no take.
Compromise has a negative connotation.
There is no compromise when it comes to corruption. You have to fight it.
Sometimes I have to compromise my views, but I never compromise on issues like the death penalty and the arm trade laws, despite what the readers or letters may say.
No opposing quotes found.