I was already, I think, at the age of 18, showing signs of being incompetent in the lab.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I missed the basic curiosity of being in the lab.
I was in an industrial laboratory because academia found me unsuitable.
I have been trying to point out that in our lives chance may have an astonishing influence and, if I may offer advice to the young laboratory worker, it would be this - never to neglect an extraordinary appearance or happening.
Everybody, as soon as they do a good experiment, their first thought in this lab is, 'That can't be right. I must have screwed it up. What did I do wrong?' And that's the best kind of scientist because they're filled with this self-doubt. And if I'm going to be honest, that's who I am. And it's what drives me.
I was strongly encouraged by a science teacher who took an interest in me and presented me with a key to the laboratory to allow me to work whenever I wanted.
So, my advice to young scientists is, think critically about your work; probably don't blab unnecessarily.
When high school students ask to spend their afternoons and weekends in my laboratory, I am amazed: I didn't develop that kind of enthusiasm for science until I was 28 years old.
Actually, I was more or less determined to be a theoretical physicist at the age of thirteen.
I was a troublemaking kid.
I was hired as a computer programmer for a national laboratory at age 15.