I'm very pro-science and pro-technology; I believe that these have been key drivers of progress in the world in the last centuries.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I have been a scientist for more than 40 years, having studied at Cambridge and Harvard. I researched and taught at Cambridge University, was a research fellow of the Royal Society, and have more than 80 publications in peer-reviewed journals. I am strongly pro-science.
I support basic research, which can lead to discoveries that change our world, expand our horizons and save lives.
I'm an inventor. I became interested in long-term trends because an invention has to make sense in the world in which it is finished, not the world in which it is started.
We need to be pro-science; we have to go back to science.
Advances in technology will continue to reach far into every sector of our economy. Future job and economic growth in industry, defense, transportation, agriculture, health care, and life sciences is directly related to scientific advancement.
I'm a pro-life candidate because I believe that science is proving us right every day.
Much of contemporary science is really the length and shadow of the technology we apply.
My successes already accomplished have mostly been taking existing science and getting people to apply it in their everyday lives.
Science and technology are the keys to both our longevity and our demise. Our entire existence on this planet is a double-edged sword.
New technologies, however remarkable they might seem, are fundamentally just tools made by people for people.
No opposing quotes found.