The vast majority of the CGI budget is labor.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think sometimes big budget means explosions! CGI! CGI, the possibilities are so limitless that it begins to be impractical.
People regard CGI as a gimmick; they almost blame CGI for a bad story or a bad script. They talk about CGI as if it's responsible for a drop in standards.
I'm not a big fan of CGI. I'm not a fan at all, unless they use it in a way that doesn't call attention to itself.
Even if I had $200 million, I'm very wary of overusing CGI. I think it's a great tool and it can be used really effectively, but I feel like it does tend to be overused and especially in sci-fi stuff.
There's a reason people use CGI: it's cheaper and faster. I hate that.
There's a depth to the look that you get with models that you just can't get with CGI. It's about the detail that you just wouldn't think to put in.
CGI has a lot of backlash now. I think it's just because there are so many people doing it. It's a tool and it's only as good as the people behind it.
It's clearly a budget. It's got a lot of numbers in it.
I don't have anything against CGI.
Even today, a lot of the CGI you see in movies is so clean and crisp that it just looks fake. It's weird: the more advanced they get, the faker it looks.
No opposing quotes found.