I am not enough of a mathematician to be able to judge either the well-foundedness or the limits of relativity in physics.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
And it really began with Einstein. We attended his lectures. Now the theory of relativity remained - and still remains - only a theory. It has not been proven. But it suggested a completely different picture of the physical world.
It would be better for the true physics if there were no mathematicians on earth.
Yeah, I am a guy working on physics outside of academia. But I'm nowhere near Einstein's caliber.
It is probably safe to say that all the changes of factual knowledge which have led to the relativity theory, resulting in a very great theoretical development, are completely trivial from any point of view except their relevance to the structure of a theoretical system.
When general relativity was first put forward in 1915, the math was very unfamiliar to most physicists. Now we teach general relativity to advanced high school students.
During this time I had the singular good fortune of being able to discuss the problem constantly with Einstein. Some experiments done at Einstein's suggestion yielded no decisively new result.
While the finish given to our picture of the world by the theory of relativity has already been absorbed into the general scientific consciousness, this has scarcely occurred to the same extent with those aspects of the general problem of knowledge which have been elucidated by the quantum theory.
We live in a Newtonian world of Einsteinian physics ruled by Frankenstein logic.
Today we say that the law of relativity is supposed to be true at all energies, but someday somebody may come along and say how stupid we were.
The scientists often have more unfettered imaginations than current philosophers do. Relativity theory came as a complete surprise to philosophers, and so did quantum mechanics, and so did other things.
No opposing quotes found.